ABSTRACT
Objective To compare the clinical efficacy of laparoscopic vs open choledocholithotomy plus T tube drainage for the treatment of extra-and intrahepatic cholangiolithiasis.Methods 300 patients with cholangiolithiasis undergoing surgical treatment in the Department of Hepatobiliary Surgery,Guizhou Provincial People's Hospital,from January 2012 to December 2016 were evaluated.Patients were divided into laparoscopic lithotomy of common bile duct plus T tube drainage group (n =120)and open surgery (n =180).Results The difference was not statistically significant in operation time (237 ±32) min,(t =0.671,P =0.504),operation success rate (100％),primary cure rate (81.7％),(x2 =0.400,P =0.531),residual stone rate (18.3％),(x2 =0.400,P =0.531),hospitalization costs (26 ±4) × 103 RMB,(t =0.981,P =0.329),perioperative complications including bile leakage(0),biliary bleeding (0),abdominal hemorrhage (0),acute cholangitis (0),(x2 =0.669,P =1.000),abdominal infection (0) and incisional infection (0),(x2 =1.342,P =0.518) and late complications including biliary stricture(0) and stone recurrence (11.7％),(x2 =0.022,P =1.000) between the two groups.While intraoperative blood loss (25 ± 14)ml,(t =-7.191,P =0.000),postoperative recovery time of gastrointestinal function (1.8 ± 0.6) d,(t =-5.847,P =0.000),postoperative hospital stay (10.1 ± 0.3) d,(t =-3.145,P =0.000),postoperative incision liquefaction (0),(x2 =26.415,P =0.000) were in favor of laparoscopy group with statistically significant difference.Conclusions For the treatment of extra-and intrahepatic cholangiolithiasis,it was feasible and effective for laparoscopic lithotomy of common bile duct plus T tube drainage.
ABSTRACT
Objective To study the feasibility and efficacy of treatment of extrahepatic cholangiolithiasis using laparoscopic self-releasing J-tube drainage combined with primary suturing of common bile duct.Methods The clinical data of 172 patients with extrahepatic cholangiolithiasis who underwent operations from March 2013 to January 2015 were retrospectively studied.The patients were divided into two groups:the J-tube drainage group (n =82) and the T-tube drainage group (n =90).Surgical duration,intraoperative bleeding,postoperative hospital stay,treatment cycles,hospital costs,incidences of postoperative bile leakage and residual extrahepatic cholangiolithiasis were compared between the two groups.Results The length of postoperative hospital stay in the J-tube drainage group was (4.9 ± 1.2) days and in the T-tube drainage group was (8.0 ± 2.0) days.The treatment cycles in the J-tube drainage group were (4.9 ± 1.2) days while in the T-tube drainage group were (24.1 ± 3.2) days.The hospital costs in the J-tube drainage group were (12 817.1 ±3 167.1) yuan and the costs in the T-tube drainage group were (15 012.5 ±2 354.8) yuan.There were significant differences in hospital stay,treatment cycles and hospital costs between the two groups (all P ＜ 0.05).The surgical duration in the J-tube drainage group was (108.2 ± 10.2) minutes and the duration in the T-tube drainage group was (110.1 ± 13.1) minutes.The amount of intraoperative bleeding in the J-tube drainage group was (35.0 ± 20.0) ml and the amount in the T-tube drainage group was (42.0 ±30.0) ml.There were no significant differences in intraoperative bleeding and surgical duration between the two groups (all P ＞ 0.05).No significant differences were observed in the incidences of post-operative bile leakage and in residual extrahepatic cholangiolithiasis between the two groups (P ＞ 0.05).Conclusions Self-releasing J-tube drainage combined with laparoscopic primary suturing of common bile duct was safe and efficacious.It was minimally invasive in treating patients with extrahepatic cholangiolithiasis.
ABSTRACT
Objective To investigate the indications and clinical efficacy of combined application of laparoscope,choledochoscope and duodenoscope in the treatment of extrahepatic cholangiolithiasis.Methods The retrospective cohort study was adopted.The chnical data of 2 364 patients with extrahepatic cholangiolithiasis who were admitted to the First Hospital of Jilin University from January 2008 to December 2015 were collected.Of the 2 364 patients,861 patients had cholecystolithiasis combined with extrahepatic cholangiolithiasis and the diameter of common bile duct ≥ 8 mm,720 patients had cholecystolithiasis combine with extrahepatic cholangiolithiasis and the diameter of common bile duct ＜ 8 mm,783 patients had only extarhepatic cholangiolithiasis.In the patients diagnosed as cholecystolithiasis combined with extrahepatic changiolithiasis,laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC) + laparoscopic common bile duct exploration (LCBDE) were applied to patients with the diameter of common bile duct≥8 mm,and the T-tube placement or primary suture was used intraoperatively according to the status of individualized patients;endoscopic sphincterotomy (EST) or endoscopic papillary balloon dilation (EPBD) + LC were applied to patients with the diameter of common bile duct ＜ 8 mm.For patients with only extrahepatic cholangiolithiasis or recurrent stones after cholecystectomy,EST or EPBD was applied,and LCBDE was applied to patients with multiple stones and maximum diameter ＞ 2 cm and unsuitable for EST or EPBD.If residual stones were found after operation in patients with T-tube placement,choledochoscope was used to extract stone;otherwise,EST or EPBD was used.Treatment outcomes including treatment method,success rate of minimally invasive lithotomy,operation time,incidence of complication,duration of postoperative hospital stay and treatment expenses,and the results of follow-up including 1-,3-year recurrence rate of stones were recorded.The follow-up was done by outpatient examination and telephone interview till January 2016.All the patients were reexamined blood routine,liver function and color doppler ultrasonography of the abdomen at 1 month,3 months,6 months,1 year and 3 years after operation.Suspected residual cholangiolithiasis found by ultrasound was varified by computer tomography (CT) or magnetic resonanced cholangiopancreatography (MRCP) imaging examination.For patients with T-tube placement,CT scan and biliary photography were performed at 2-3 months postoperatively to determine whether residual stones existed and T tube could be pulled out.Measurement data were presented as mean (range).Results Of 2 364 patients,2 271 patients received minimally invasive lithotomy successfully.Of 861 patients of cholecystolithiasis combined with extrahepatic cholangiolithiasis and the diameter of common bile duct≥8 mm,836 succeeded in minimally invasive lithotomy,with a success rate of 97.10％ (836/861),the other 25 patients were converted to open surgery.Seven hundred and three patients of 836 patients received T-tube placement in LCBDE,and the mean operation time,incidence of complications,duration of postoperative hospital stay and treatment expenses were 97 minutes (range,41-167 minutes),3.70％ (26/703),6.7 days (range,3.0-32.0 days) and 3.4 × 104 yuan (range,1.5 × 104-6.7 × 104 yuan),respectively.One hundred and thirtythree patients of 836 patients received primary suture,and the mean operation time,incidence of complications,duration of postoperative hospital stay and treatment expenses were 89 minutes (range,39-123 minutes),3.01％ (4/133),4.1 days (range,2.0-17.0 days),2.1 × 104 yuan (range,1.6 × 104-3.4 × 104 yuan),respectively.Of 720 patients with the diameter of common bile duct ＜ 8 mm who underwent EST or EPBD + LC,687 succeeded in minimally invasive lithotomy,with a success rate of 95.42％ (687/720),the other 33 patients were converted to open surgery.The mean operation time,incidence of complications,duration of postoperative hospital stay and treatment expenses of 687 patients were 101 minutes (range,69-163 minutes),2.91％ (20/687),5.6 days (range,2.0-15.0 days) and 2.8 × 104 yuan (range,2.0 × 104-6.4 × 104 yuan),respectively.In 783 patients with only extrahepatic cholangiolithiasis or recurrent stones after cholecystectomy,701 of 725 patients who were treated with EST or EPBD succeeded in minimally invasive lithotomy,with a success rate of 96.69％ (701/ 725),and the mean operation time,incidence of complications,duration of postoperative hospital stay and treatment expenses of 701 patients were 47 minutes (range,11-79 minutes),2.28％ (16/701),3.7 days (range,2.0-19.0 days),1.7 × 104 yuan (range,1.3 × 104-5.5 × 104 yuan),respectively;47 of 58 patients who were treated with LCBDE succeeded in lithotomy,with a success rate of 81.03％ (47/58),and the mean operation time,incidence of complications,duration of postoperative hospital stay and treatment expenses were 124 minutes (range,94-170 minutes),8.51％ (4/47),7.9 days (range,5.0-21.0 days) and 3.8 × 104 yuan (range,2.3 × 104-7.9 × 104 yuan),respectively.Of 2 364 patients,2 207 were followed up for a mean time of 38 months (range,1-72 months).The 1-,3-year recurrence rates were 2.74％ (19/693) and 5.08％ (24/472) in patients receiving LC + LCBDE,3.10％ (21/677) and 5.69％ (30/527)in patients receiving EST or EPBD +LC for cholecystolithiasis combined with extrahepatic cholangiolithiasis.The 1-,3-year recurrence rates were 3.22％ (20/621) and 6.11％ (25/409) in patients receiving EST or EPBD + LC,7.32％ (3/41) and 11.11％(2/18) in patients receiving LCBDE for only extrahepatic cholangiolithiasis or recurrent stones after cholecystectomy.Conclusions It is safe and effective to treat extrahepatic cholangiolithiasis based on combined application of laparoscope,choledochoscope and duodenoscope,with choosing appropriate indications as the key to improve the therapeutic effect.Primary suture in the LCBDE is recommended because it can protect patients from T-tube placement.
ABSTRACT
Objective To discuss the way of treatment of bile duct stone with laparoscope and choledochoscope. Methods Forty six patients with bile duct stones admitted in our hospital from July 2001. to July 2008 were selected in this study. The 46 cases were divided into two groups:the control and observation group.The control group included 22 patients who were performed cholecystectomy and choledochotomy with T tube drainage. The obeservation group included 24 patients who were performed laparoscope and choledochoscope operation.We used the Mann-Whites statistics and compared the incidence of complications, the amount of bleeding and hospitalized days in patients between two groups. When P<0.05, the difference between the two groups was considered statistically significant. Results The incidence of complications after operation, amount of bleeding and hospitalized days in patients had no statistically significant difference between two groups. The time of operation in observation group was longer than control group. The bile stones eradication rate in observation group was higher than control gourp. and the bile stones recurring rate in observation group was lower than control gourp. Conclusion It is better to treat the bile duct stones by using laparoscope with choledochoscope than the way of traditional cholecystectomy and choledochotomy with T tube drainage, the former has advantages such as higher bile duct stones edarication rate, lower recurring rate, safer and more reliable operation and fewer complications.